Your one stop shop for conservative posters!

« Jo sent THIS ... | MAIN | The Supposistory »

07/10/2005

Ray Guns ...

I have known of this research for a long time. Don't ask how.

   All you need to know is that it is viable and available for use NOW. In time, bullets will become obsolete. Bombs as well. Warfare will be conducted on a need to kill basis.

                     If you'd like a good story for a change ... read this.

.

    Military's Energy-Beam Weapons Delayed

By BRIAN BERGSTEIN, AP Technology Writer

ARLINGTON, Va. - For years, the U.S. military has explored a new kind of firepower that is instantaneous, precise and virtually inexhaustible: beams of electromagnetic energy. "Directed-energy" pulses can be throttled up or down depending on the situation, much like the phasers on "Star Trek" could be set to kill or merely stun.

Such weapons are now nearing fruition. But logistical issues have delayed their battlefield debut — even as soldiers in Iraq encounter tense urban situations in which the nonlethal capabilities of directed energy could be put to the test.

"It's a great technology with enormous potential, but I think the environment's not strong for it," said James Jay Carafano, a senior fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation who blames the military and Congress for not spending enough on getting directed energy to the front. "The tragedy is that I think it's exactly the right time for this."

The hallmark of all directed-energy weapons is that the target — whether a human or a mechanical object — has no chance to avoid the shot because it moves at the speed of light. At some frequencies, it can penetrate walls.

Since the ammunition is merely light or radio waves, directed-energy weapons are limited only by the supply of electricity. And they don't involve chemicals or projectiles that can be inaccurate, accidentally cause injury or violate international treaties.

"When you're dealing with people whose full intent is to die, you can't give people a choice of whether to comply," said George Gibbs, a systems engineer for the Marine Expeditionary Rifle Squad Program who oversees directed-energy projects. "What I'm looking for is a way to shoot everybody, and they're all OK."

Almost as diverse as the electromagnetic spectrum itself, directed-energy weapons span a wide range of incarnations.

Among the simplest forms are inexpensive, handheld lasers that fill people's field of vision, inducing a temporary blindness to ensure they stop at a checkpoint, for example. Some of these already are used in Iraq.

Other radio-frequency weapons in development can sabotage the electronics of land mines, shoulder-fired missiles or automobiles — a prospect that interests police departments in addition to the military.

A separate branch of directed-energy research involves bigger, badder beams: lasers that could obliterate targets tens of miles away from ships or planes. Such a strike would be so surgical that, as some designers put it at a recent conference here, the military could plausibly deny responsibility.

The flexibility of directed-energy weapons could be vital as wide-scale, force-on-force conflict becomes increasingly rare, many experts say. But the technology has been slowed by such practical concerns as how to shrink beam-firing antennas and power supplies.

Military officials also say more needs to be done to assure the international community that directed-energy weapons set to stun rather than kill will not harm noncombatants.

Such issues recently led the Pentagon to delay its Project Sheriff, a plan to outfit vehicles in Iraq with a combination of lethal and nonlethal weaponry — including a highly touted microwave-energy blaster that makes targets feel as if their skin is on fire. Sheriff has been pushed at least to 2006.

"It was best to step back and make sure we understand where we can go with it," said David Law, science and technology chief for the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate.

The directed-energy component in the project is the Active Denial System, developed by Air Force researchers and built by Raytheon Co. It produces a millimeter-wavelength burst of energy that penetrates 1/64 of an inch into a person's skin, agitating water molecules to produce heat. The sensation is certain to get people to halt whatever they are doing.

Military investigators say decades of research have shown that the effect ends the moment a person is out of the beam, and no lasting damage is done as long as the stream does not exceed a certain duration. How long? That answer is classified, but it apparently is in the realm of seconds, not minutes. The range of the beam also is secret, though it is said to be further than small arms fire, so an attacker could be repelled before he could pull a trigger.

Although Active Denial works — after a $51 million, 11-year investment — it has proven to be a "model for how hard it is to field a directed-energy nonlethal weapon," Law said.

For example, the prototype system can be mounted on a Humvee but the vehicle has to stop in order to fire the beam. Using the vehicle's electrical power "is pushing its limits," he added.

Still, Raytheon is pressing ahead with smaller, portable, shorter-range spinoffs of Active Denial for embassies, ships or other sensitive spots.

One potential customer is the Department of Energy. Researchers at its Sandia National Laboratories are testing Active Denial as a way to repel intruders from nuclear facilities. But Sandia researchers say the beams won't be in place until 2008 at the earliest because so much testing remains.

In the meantime, Raytheon is trying to drum up business for an automated airport-defense project known as Vigilant Eagle that detects shoulder-fired missiles and fries their electronics with an electromagnetic wave. The system, which would cost $25 million per airport, has proven effective against a "real threat," said Michael Booen, a former Air Force colonel who heads Raytheon's directed-energy work. He refused to elaborate.

For Peter Bitar, the future of directed energy boils down to money.

Bitar heads Indiana-based Xtreme Alternative Defense Systems Ltd., which makes small blinding lasers used in Iraq. But his real project is a nonlethal energy device called the StunStrike.

Basically, it fires a bolt of lightning. It can be tuned to blow up explosives, possibly to stop vehicles and certainly to buzz people. The strike can be made to feel as gentle as "broom bristles" or cranked up to deliver a paralyzing jolt that "takes a few minutes to wear off."

Bitar, who is of Arab descent, believes StunStrike would be particularly intimidating in the Middle East because, he contends, people there are especially afraid of lightning.

At present, StunStrike is a 20-foot tower that can zap things up to 28 feet away. The next step is to shrink it so it could be wielded by troops and used in civilian locales like airplane cabins or building entrances.

Xtreme ADS also needs more tests to establish that StunStrike is safe to use on people.

But all that takes money — more than the $700,000 Bitar got from the Pentagon from 2003 until the contract recently ended.

Bitar is optimistic StunStrike will be perfected, either with revenue from the laser pointers or a partnership with a bigger defense contractor. In the meantime, though, he wishes soldiers in Iraq already had his lightning device on difficult missions like door-to-door searches.

"It's very frustrating when you know you've got a solution that's being ignored," he said. "The technology is the easy part."

...Yahoo News

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451bab869e200d834597e2e69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Ray Guns ...:

» Brunch: 7/10/2005 from basil's blog
Try one of these specials with your weekend brunch: Stop The ACLU! has a landmark day. Okay, half a landmark. The Steel Deal has phasers on stun. The New Editor looks at Durbin vs Daley. SarahK finds a TV crime [Read More]

Comments

I can see the soldiers with these in hand - especially the wide range lasers. Get a group of insurgents and zap 'em. Then make 'em dance. Like in the old west when they'd shoot the ground to make the black hat dance. ha ha ha...

They listed one problem as being the feared result of using these weapons. That people would be afraid of them... um. So, mount an ad campaign for Al Jazeera showing two insurgents and a couple of military dudes talking to the camera explaining what the weapons can do. "See, with this setting, we just make the enemy dance." Camera pans to insurgent as military dude zaps him and insurgent twitches and starts doing the moon walk with some added herky jerky motions. Then the military dude turns back to the camera: "See. He's still alive and knows western dances. Now, watch as we up the amps." Then the camera pans to the second insurgent. He will be standing there horrified that he might be made to dance. Military dude aims and vaporizes him on the spot leaving the audience no doubt that dancing for virgins is all this guy will be doing. Military dude turns to camera and says: "See? Our choice. Your choice. We fry: You die. We sizzle: You pizzle. Surrender now."

For more camera fun for Al Jazeera, the military dudes could toss chickens up in the air for a real live skeet fry. Poof! Chicken gone. Fried chicken falls out of sky and military dudes eat it with relish. Toss a nice piggie up and down comes some pork chops. That might be more effective because of the gag effect.

Why are these scientists having so much trouble getting this weaponry going? The article is so poorly written I don't buy the excuses. I would think a ship five hundred miles away vaporizing an entire battalion and then playing dumb is too cool. "We didn't do it. Honest. We were just floating here listening to Howard Stern on Sirius and watching phospheresence in the gulf. Our sailors were relaxing." har har..... Too cool to be true.

That lightning bolt gun is way awesome. Out of the desert a storm of dust. Walking out of the cloud is one of our G.I.'s in full regalia. At his hip, a weapon never seen before. Very small pistolie. Insurgents laugh after they get over pooping themselves at the Clint Eastwood appearance from the dust. 'Oh, yuk yuk.. lookit American with tiny gun.' har har. Then comes the lightning bolt. Can you even imagine? I love it! Star Dust Wars. Bring it on!

>Using the vehicle's electrical power "is pushing its limits," he added.<

What's with this stupidness? Each humvee carries a generator. Let the military dudes figure this one out. Sometimes scientists are shortsighted.

And change that dumb name: "Active Denial" which is an oxymoron to "Deadly Denial". More fitting. The only true active denial is what the ship's captain will be doing when he denies wiping out an entire concatenation of insurgents from five-hundred miles away. :)

The fact that this item is public information means we are at least 10 years beyond what it states.

I like that.

Can you say 'whirling dervish'?

And what about misapplications?...

http://nowatermelons.blogspot.com/2005_07_10_nowatermelons_archive.html#112108009892921328

J Bowen ...

Like under cooking?

Actually, yeah. If we're fighting idiots in the Middle East, I want those things turned up to "quick fry for a crackly crunch" to kill them off before they get their own hands on these weapons.

They won't show such restraint themselves.

I like Amy's scenario above.

Like I said on your blog ... never knew a military to worry about anything short of lethality. I figure if there's another incident here ... we WILL use small tactical nukes. Or maybe ONE BIG as a demo of our intent.

Back to Top

« Jo sent THIS ... | Main | The Supposistory »

The comments to this entry are closed.